Mail Merge Limitations: Why a Simple Task Still Feels Like a Battle

2026 Diary Notebook (Amazon)

Mail merge was supposed to be one of Microsoft Word’s most user‑friendly features: connect a data source, insert fields, and generate personalized documents with ease. Yet in 2025, the experience of merging long text from Excel into Word still exposes flaws that feel more like relics of the 1990s than tools for today’s editors.

Background

One fine day, I thought of creating a 2026 diary for myself containing one quote for each day. Thought of keeping 365 quotes against each day of 2026 in an Excel file and mail merge into a Word template to create a beautiful diary without realizing the obstacles that were waiting to stop me from accomplishing such a simple looking task.

When “Simple” Becomes Complex

What should have been a routine merge of 365 quotes quickly turned into a puzzle of truncated text and inflated page counts. Instead of clean output, Word delivered:

• Truncated fields: Quotes cut off after 255 characters, despite being complete in Excel.
• Unexpected pagination: 365 records ballooned into 729 pages, doubling the expected output.

Hidden Causes

The culprits were not obvious:

• Legacy connection limits: Word’s default OLE DB link to Excel silently caps text at 255 characters.
• Invisible alternatives: The more reliable DDE connection option is hidden unless you enable “Confirm file format conversion on open.”
• Automatic section breaks: Word inserts “Section Break (Next Page)” after each record, inflating page counts even when the template itself has no breaks.
• Workflow constraints: Print and mail merge options don’t produce editable Word documents, forcing reliance on “Edit Individual Documents” with manual cleanup.

Workarounds, Not Solutions

To get usable output, the workflow had to be reinvented:

• CSV instead of XLSX: Saving the Excel sheet as CSV UTF‑8 bypassed the 255‑character cutoff.
• DDE connection: By enabling “Confirm file format conversion on open,” the hidden DDE option appeared, allowing full text import.
• Replacing breaks: A global Find/Replace converted ^b (section breaks) into ^m (page breaks), restoring the correct page count.
• Manual document output: Since print/mail options weren’t viable, the merge relied on generating a Word document and cleaning it afterward.

A Call for User‑Centric Design

This experience underscores a larger truth: Microsoft’s mail merge system still carries legacy assumptions that undermine usability. Editors and professionals shouldn’t have to dig through obscure settings, convert files to CSV, or run global replacements just to merge text fields correctly.

Mail merge remains powerful, but it needs modernization. Transparent defaults, intuitive options, and workflows that respect the user’s time would transform it from a source of frustration back into the productivity booster it was meant to be. Until then, even the simplest tasks risk becoming exercises in endurance rather than efficiency.

---

How to Avoid Truncation and Page Inflation in Word Mail Merge

• Use CSV UTF‑8 instead of XLSX to bypass the 255‑character limit.
• Enable “Confirm file format conversion on open” in Word’s advanced options to unlock the DDE connection.
• Choose DDE when connecting to Excel for full‑length text fields.
• Replace section breaks (^b) with page breaks (^m) in the merged output to normalize page counts.
• Avoid Print/Mail merge outputs if you need editable Word documents; use “Edit Individual Documents” instead.
• Check your template for hidden breaks before merging — use simple page breaks (Ctrl+Enter) rather than section breaks.